When you're looking at the use of facial recognition technology and protecting charter and privacy rights, should we take the same approach as we do for wiretaps?
I know the CSE and CSIS do a lot of monitoring of online chatter, trying to focus on things like terrorism and transnational criminal organizations. Again, they can't do indirectly what they're prohibited from doing directly. Whenever they're going to be in violation of the charter, they have to get a warrant or ministerial authorization to ensure that they become charter compliant. When you talk about authorized purposes, is that what you had in mind? Do there need to be warrants or ministerial authorizations making the claim that it is required and proportionate to the violation that may happen to an individual's rights?