Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to all of our witnesses today. This has been a really informative process of learning.
I'm happy to have all three witnesses answer.
Each of you has talked about the need for strong, independent oversight powers of audit when it comes to the processes that use FRT technology, particularly law enforcement. We had a brief time with the RCMP and the TPS last week, and they talked about risk evaluation and terms of use.
What are the mechanisms or proposed recommendations regarding who determines the risk level to justify use? I'm pleased that there are recommendations today, but the details on how that would be done are pretty thin. The risk assessment could be on an immediate-needs basis. It's almost as if we'd be assessing whether use was justified after the fact.
Perhaps Mr. Therrien can start.