When it comes to child exploitation, we realize that Clearview AI is not always correct. That's why we have a human intervention piece in there. It is absolutely critical to have a member actually view the results to see if they are true.
We did, in fact, test it ourselves, and we did find that false negatives were coming out of the program, so we're fully aware of that. If there is a better technology, that would be fine; however, you always need that human interaction and that human review process to take place. As we propose, in the future we will always have that, and it's absolutely critical.
Facial recognition technology is simply another tool in the tool box. It cannot be operated on its own, independently of any other processes. The human process is absolutely critical. The technology simply gets us to identify the victim in a quicker fashion. Traditional ways can then take over, but it will always be used with human interaction.