Not at the moment. It's not something that I have paid particular attention to. I've come to live with this situation and have come to expect that some of those are excluded from disclosure.
However, if you look at the access regime as being allegedly universal, then I would tend to reach across to you and say that although that's probably a noble goal, this goal ought to be on you here, if any place. I haven't seen any movement among myself or colleagues to extend the right of access.
Of course, the ideal would be that it be 100%, but nothing has 100% coverage, whether it's within the court or even here in the House of Commons.
Those people, at the moment, are excluded, and the decision of whether or not to include them under the act belongs to parliament. That's where, I think, it is fair and proper that it be addressed.