Now it's coming back to me. I remember that one reason I moved that motion was that at the time, following the Ontario election in 2018, there was an investigation and actually a conviction. The information of 60,000 clients of the 407 was shared and used by a certain party for their electoral advantage. At the time, that was the reason.
My point is that it was investigated and people were convicted. At the end of that, I called for a study on the incident.
Again, I'm not a permanent member of this committee anymore, but my memory of my impression of this committee at the time was that when you run parallel investigations.... There may or may not be an investigation going on right now. I don't know. If there is, then there's no point of studying it. If there is a covert investigation, I don't know if this committee will be helpful in running something similar. It may jeopardize the result or the process of that investigation.
That's all.