Mr. Larsen, you talked a little bit about the role of cabinet confidence. I'll share with you, as a member of Parliament on the opposition side, that I believe—it's my opinion—that cabinet confidence is a mere convention of Parliament and not a legislative precedent or a legal precedent, and that the House of Commons ought to be the grand inquest of the nation and have complete access.
That's not the case. In fact, we are often as frustrated as regular citizens are in trying to get basic information.
In your opinion, can you comment about how the role of the government, being the client and simultaneously the solicitor, as was identified by the former attorney general, presents a bit of a problem in unpacking the role of cabinet confidence in access to information?