Thanks for the revision. I just have one question to ask.
The French says “examiner la pertinence” or “review the need”. Something is either needed, or it is not. Then we ask that an explanation be provided, but I just want to make sure we will get one. I agree with the content, but I think it's slightly vague here and I'd like to clarify that. Redaction is either needed or not needed, and I want to make sure that an explanation is provided if redaction is needed.
There are two parts to this motion, one about necessity and one about explanation. I just want to make sure they go hand in hand.