I'm all for complete transparency. As regards the document you saw, the health and safety of certain employees who had received threats were also a concern. Consequently, in the circumstances, you can understand why we acted cautiously. I'm saying that as a minister, but the deputy minister could say more about that. We also need a framework that can help protect privacy. In this instance, we received information that threats had been made against certain individuals. As you will understand, we also have a duty of care.
I say that as a parliamentarian. I think we have to be aware of it. If there's a way to submit the information, whether it be in camera or otherwise, I'm in favour of full transparency. These documents are of public interest.
As I said, I want to get to the bottom of this matter, but I want to do it the right way, in accordance with natural law and procedural fairness, but also while protecting health and safety. I was informed that certain individuals had been threatened. Parliamentarians must be aware of that. We want to get to the bottom of this, but we want to do things properly as well, to protect employees' health and safety.