All right. You said it was. You referred to it as the “Osler whitewash investigation”. You went on to say, “They could have done it in a way that exonerated the board and scapegoated Leah.”
I expect you were referring to Ms. Lawrence.
Was it the RCGT report that gave him confidence that the board did not need to be fired? It found that there was $48 million in suspected wrongdoing. The minister referred to this at committee as a forensic audit. It was, of course, not that. It was a fact-finding exercise, and that is why Canada's Auditor General has launched an investigation.
It also found wrongdoing in a sample of only 21 projects, and it said that the conflict of interest rules were not followed. Is this what gave confidence to the minister, that readout?