Yes, and we contemplated this scenario in which I talked about the absurdity of the current legislation, under which I can't accept an $800 bottle of champagne, but somebody can send a limo to my house, pick me up and fly me across the country, and we can drink the $800 bottle of champagne together and that's okay. That's what's absurd about what we're talking about here today.
I want to put this last question to you.
Is it your opinion that if we eliminated sponsored travel, your work would be a lot easier in terms of dealing with perhaps more important issues after this grey area of self-reporting and ambiguity around limitations had been eliminated?