You've seen and we've distributed an assessment tool that is distributed across the government. In addition to the distribution and development of an assessment tool, and again, in co-operation with the commissioner, there is an extensive process of training so that individuals across the public service system have the same tool and the same training with respect to the operation of that assessment tool. That is an important element of how we build sensitivity across the public service system, not just in the Privy Council Office and not just in the Office of the Prime Minister, but also across the public service system and indeed across the system of political offices in departments across the system.
Our effort here is, in effect, to have everyone on the same page, to think the same way, to look for the same things and to raise the same flags. Those eventually percolate up into the Privy Council Office or up into the Office of the Prime Minister, where eventually the two administrators—the Prime Minister's chief of staff and I—take decisions as to whether or not the screen should be imposed.
I do want to reiterate something, though, and this is important. From the moment a flag is raised, a screen is imposed. It could be that when that issue comes to me or to Mr. Blanchard, or perhaps to the deputy secretary of governance of the Privy Council Office, we would say, “Wait a minute. It actually doesn't make sense. Yes, it's good to do that in an abundance of caution, but in fact, there's no need for a screen.” That has not happened, but it is conceivable, so that—
