Thank you.
Something that Mr. Barrett suggested, other than this not being an indictment of the Prime Minister, when he asked his first round of questions—and he just did it again—was that you put these assets in the blind trust and then you could subsequently act to benefit the blind trust. The fact of the matter is that, when assets go into the blind trust, you no longer know what happens after. The assets and the structure of the trust could change because the trustee is now responsible for that. Is that right?