You're telling me that he knows his obligations. However, your logic should have applied in the same way when you said that there had to be a blind trust. You could have said that there was no need for a blind trust. Since he knows his obligations, he would never end up in a conflict of interest. The logic you're using here should apply in the same way.
I'm sorry, but even if meetings are prohibited, the Prime Minister can use his cellphone. It must be said that he comes from a network that suits everyone, in the situation we're in. At least tell me you're keeping an eye on him for that, that you told him to be careful about that. What you're telling me is that it's not necessary, because he knows what needs to be done.
Do you really think that's responsible behaviour for a conflict of interest screen administrator?