Exactly.
That's why I referred to the Federal Court of Appeal ruling. Interestingly, we could have a recusal system that works more as a remedy than as a preventive measure, in some respects.
In this case, there was a divestment. The Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner and the Prime Minister agreed to do more and to go above and beyond the divestment. A list of companies known to the Prime Minister was compiled. This list can be found in annex A.
We also introduced a preventive measure to ensure that the Prime Minister doesn't end up in a conflict of interest situation. This is important not only for the Prime Minister, but also for the institution that he represents and for the government. The goal is to ensure the government's success.