I got part of an answer in the first half, so I'm going to move to my next one, if that's okay. If you reflect on it afterwards, and you want to submit it to the committee in writing, I'd appreciate that.
Mr. Bourgon, your institute warns about catastrophic AI risks, though you did temper some of that in your opening statement. You said that it might not all be bad.
There is an absence of binding legislation, and we have a reliance on voluntary codes. Do you think this approach is sufficient to prevent the worst-case scenario, or do you think that to prevent the worst-case scenario, the most extreme effort should be undertaken, which would be a moratorium on development until robust and conflict-free regulations are put in place?