There is one institution that reviews the legislation, which will rank it compared to that of other countries. I think Canada is now 58 out of 109, so we're in the middle. Our act is not the best in terms of its accessibility and transparency and the level to which the institution that it's applicable to....
One of the places I like to compare us to is Scotland, which has very progressive legislation. The commissioner there has the authority to monitor how institutions are doing, which I don't. There's also legislation that allows the office of the information commissioner to do outreach and education, which I also do, even though it's not in my act. I think it's important for people to understand what their rights are and how the legislation is applicable.
The implementation of legislation is really hard to monitor because it's within the administration of the government and each institution is doing it differently, so we have institutions that are doing really well and others that are not doing as well with the same act. So far, there are not a lot of tools out there to say which country is doing better than others.
Interestingly, in Brazil, they don't have an independent commissioner, but every access request is on their website. The time it takes to respond to every access request is available.
There are some tools out there, and every time I see something like these, I tell TBS, because I want it to compare and see what best practices exist. Clearly, Canada can do better. We used to be doing really well, but at this point, we're not meeting up with the current principles in legislation.