The U.K.'s model, which has a principles-based approach and is sectoral-focused, does not take regulation off the table entirely, but uses an iterative approach to better understand where there are gaps in regulation and where it can better target regulation to support, if needed, a horizontal law. If not, it can support regulators in providing effective guidance through a consultative approach with industry and other players. I think that aligns very nicely with Canada's approach, generally.
Singapore is interesting. It has had a number of sandboxes, particularly AI Verify, which has been effective in testing different trust models. It has invested quite a bit in the national AI literacy program. We see a different reaction to AI in countries like Singapore that are more trusting of the technology, which will lead to greater adoption and a strong focus on economics and competitiveness.