You also noted that Canada really led the way and is a leader when it comes to research, but we haven't been such a leader when it comes to commercialization. We're certainly not a leader when it comes to adoption. We're far behind the United States.
In this broad debate about regulations, isn't there a real risk that taking a risk-averse approach will result in a regulatory framework that in some respects misses the boat in terms of actually addressing real risks? In other words, there's an overreach that is counterproductive and in the process stifles innovation, stifles commercialization and stifles adoption as the rest of the world moves ahead.