One thing, historically, we have tried to do in one piece of legislation is regulate both the composition of these systems and their application. You can view that as an opportunity to separate some of those thoughts, which is why we're putting forward using use cases to understand where and how this technology is being disruptive or deceiving people. Where do we not understand where it is and how it is distorting markets?
The second fundamental challenge for Canada is how, in complementary trade agreements, we're constrained through the digital chapter in CUSMA from achieving what many people would want us to be able to do, such as, for instance, mandating data residency or auditing algorithms to even try to start to understand them. We cannot do that because we're constrained. As we look forward to what we want to be able to do when it comes to interpreting, understanding, appreciating, governing or having the right oversight or auditability of those algorithmic systems, we are currently unable to do that.