Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to the witnesses.
Before I ask my questions, I would just like to say that I agree with you about recognizing the risk, recognizing the problem itself. The risk of AI goes beyond generative AI. It's more than that, because artificial intelligence is now superintelligence, as you called it. It has become an infrastructure that encompasses everything we do and everything under our power. It affects humans a great deal. You did a good job of presenting it, and I fully understand what prompted you to do so. I find that very noble on your part.
That said, we're talking about control. What do we want to control? What can be controlled? The issue with trying to legislate digital technology is that it is usually what we call extraterritorial. It is not in a state-controlled territory where diplomacy can be used or national legislation put in place. That's the problem. I can use software, artificial intelligence or a solution on my computer that isn't necessarily made in my country.
I'll tell you what I always say repeatedly.
You named it and gave much more territory-based examples. For example, cloning and nuclear are much more territory-based. How do you see a way to control use? I'd like to hear from all three of you on that.
As for controlling dependence on AI, I don't think we are able to halt or slow down its creation. However, we can control how citizens use it. When I say control, I mean education.
You are experts on this, so I would like to hear your comments.