I have a point of order, Mr. Chair.
I'm new here, but I just want to understand why we're discussing the project in general when a motion has been moved on a very specific subject. We have an hour. We're here to talk about a minister who said he recused himself but didn't. We don't want to hear about the project; we've already voted on it in the House. We want to know whether or not the minister recused himself and whether we can conduct our study. We could spend 10 years talking about the pros and cons of the project.
Can we stick to what we're supposed to be doing today?