The OECD's anti-bribery convention says that foreign bribery cases must not be influenced by national economic interest or by the identity of a company involved. In that Liberal scandal with SNC-Lavalin, we saw that the government repeatedly relied on fabricated jobs and economic arguments.
Does Canada's current lobbying regime do enough to expose those pressure campaigns built around those arguments, when the beneficiary is a major corporation with significant political access?
In your previous response, you said it's about lessons learned and really what consequences are brought to bear. Does the current regime go far enough, knowing what we know now following that very significant scandal?