I'll take that question, if I may.
Thank you very much. That's a very interesting question and an issue that we discuss on a regular basis.
The answer lies in the second element you suggested. In other words, we are fully aware that there might not be a consolidated national strategy; however, strategic goals that are scattered across various legislative and policy instruments have been adopted at the federal level under the Criminal Code, the Financial Administration Act and so forth.
Under the OECD's approach, which is incorporated in our recommendation on public integrity and upon which our analysis and report are based, we recommend that even though there isn't a single document, there should be a central strategic approach to anti-corruption.
That's probably what is missing in Canada's system, and this has been included in that analysis and indicator, which I think might be the only one where Canada doesn't rank high. Even though Canada is ahead in all the other areas, this is still a weakness. A stronger strategic approach is needed, one that goes beyond the legislation and provides a policy direction on anti-corruption and enhanced integrity at the federal level.