I have one point before I mention the regulation in British Columbia. Our indicators and measurements do not cover regulations at the provincial level or at the state level. Our analysis, when it comes to our data measurement, is limited to a national, federal level. We have not analyzed in detail the regime in British Columbia.
That being said, as the commissioner from British Columbia mentioned earlier today, we also have discussions with regulators at the provincial level. We did publish a report on Quebec. British Columbia is part of our network of lobbying regulators. The key strengths of the system that were mentioned throughout the discussions today are the fact that communications reports do not cover just pre-arranged meetings, but all oral and written communications. This is in line with the practices across the OECD.
A system of monetary penalties is also aligned with these best practices and with our recommendations. These would be the key elements that I would say differentiate British Columbia from the federal level. The thresholds issues, which were a significant part of it, were removed. These are some of the key points that differentiate British Columbia from the federal level, but, again, we have not gone into detail of the system in B.C. in our indicators.