I have a question.
Chair, having heard Mr. Thériault's comments, I'm just wondering how Mr. Thériault would like to proceed. I appreciate his well-articulated position, but instead of proceeding through a series of subamendments and amendments, there is a compromise that's been proposed by Ms. Church. I'm just wondering if there's a mechanism for us to advance Ms. Church's proposal, even if it would include giving Mr. Thériault the obviously unanimous consent not on its first attempt, but if there would be a way to do that even with Mr. Thériault having the opportunity, if he wishes, to formally register a dissenting vote, or if he is satisfied having expressed very clearly that he doesn't support the removal of the third witness, which I respect and appreciate.
If he has obviously expressed an intention not to do what we just saw for the last week, which is to have a filibuster, I'm just wondering if there's a way to get to a resolution, while respecting that he doesn't agree per se with the unanimous adoption of the proposal by Mr. Church.