Thank you, Mr. Thériault.
Once again, we're on the subamendment. It's very clear what the subamendment is, and that is to remove the executives from Alto from appearing, which I think addresses at least some of the stated concerns of members of the Liberal Party, and to just have the CEO, Martin Imbleau, appear before committee. That's what we're dealing with.
I'm going to forewarn everyone here about getting beyond this subamendment and talking about issues that aren't relevant to the subamendment. For the last 14 hours I've heard a lot of discussion about the value and virtue of Alto. That's not what we're discussing here. From an ethical standpoint, the motion is very clear, and I'll say it again, the minister's claims that he recused himself from decisions his government made related to Alto. That's, quite frankly, what we're studying here. I'm not going to be seeking any more interventions on points of order. I'm going to make it very clear right now, if I determine that what we're discussing is not relevant or germane to this issue, I will be moving on to the next speaker. You can put yourself back on the list if you like, but I'm not going to sit here and take this for another 15 hours.
Ms. Church, I'm going back to you on the subamendment. I'll remind you that the subamendment is to have the CEO, Martin Imbleau, appear for two hours before committee. That's it. Go ahead, please.