I'm going to call the meeting back to order.
We are dealing with a unanimous consent motion that's been proposed by Ms. Church:
That the committee undertake a study into the connection between the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and Alto, and the Minister's claims that he has recused himself from decisions his government made related to Alto; that, for the purpose of this study, the committee invite the following witnesses to appear in the week of May 25, 2026:
1. Konrad von Finckenstein, Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, for one hour;
2. The Minister of Finance and National Revenue for one hour.
I do understand as well that there is an issue with the French language version of this that the clerk will correct if it is the intention of the committee to adopt this unanimous consent motion.
There's no debate on this. Do I have the consent of the committee to adopt the motion presented by Ms. Church?
I see yes on this side.
Monsieur Thériault? No?
Unanimous consent has not been granted.
We are still on the subamendment. I don't have any more speakers on the subamendment, so if there is an intention to get on the list, tell me now.
I see that Mr. Thériault wishes to speak.
You have the floor regarding the subamendment, Mr. Thériault.