Totally, and that's totally a different topic altogether, in terms of Mr. Trump.
Professor Stedman, I really liked your testimony as well and your answers to the questions in terms of a common-sense, balanced approach. Fundamentally, at the core of this is influence. It can be money, but it's influence.
I think about my home riding of Cape Breton and Sydney—Glace Bay. We talked about it before testimony. I'm thinking not so much of the bankers or the financiers who may come to government—God bless them; we need them. I'm also thinking of the not-for-profit world that I come from. I deal with a lot of not-for-profits in Cape Breton and, in fact, across the country.
In terms of the balance and the common-sense approach, I'm wondering what your perspective is on how best to handle that in terms of making sure that if we go forward with recommendations, it's covered in a very balanced way.
A second piece is around putting rules in place for the not-for-profits. It's often said that culture drives the strategy. In terms of rules or laws, do you think there's a time period when not-for-profits in particular would need to learn about the new rules and whether they are applied? I think that a lot of folks in the not-for-profit world don't have that capacity, but they would need to get that capacity, if that makes sense.