We're building this plane in the air. This is going to complicate it because I don't have this in writing, so we'll have to write it, send it to the clerk and then get it translated. This is likely going to precipitate a suspension, but I would like there to be a discussion about whether Liberal members are amenable to this. Perhaps that could productively happen between now and the next meeting. We'll need to get some indication of that. Otherwise, perhaps we just continue on until the wee hours of the morning.
My subamendment would be that the amendment be amended by replacing “pursuant to the Assessment Tool” with “(iii) any records of discussions”, and that's in part two.
Recognizing that it's as complicated to write after I have said it as it was for me to have said it.... I'm not sure at what juncture you'd like to suspend, but I'm also happy to attempt to articulate what that is and why it's important.
Mr. Chair, just while you take a quick look at it, I'll say that this is information that exists, so we're not looking for the creation of new information. This is not going to create more kinetic activity at PCO or slow them down in the other work they're doing. However, it does further the ends that Ms. Church is advancing with her amendment to the motion.
