It's going to be fact-dependent.
Just very quickly, I think your example is why we shouldn't have the automatic threshold for registration, because there are some small businesses.... Anyone who's interested in that can cross-reference their activities in the election cycle. They make a contribution that very conspicuously shows up in your own record. I think there are other tools there.
I've absolutely been involved with situations where, oops, you didn't quite register in time and enter into some kind of a compliance agreement. The goal should be to get the information into the registry as quickly as possible. The goal should not be to go after the made-up number of people who have transgressed the act in some way, shape or form. It should be to make sure that the information gets into the public domain as quickly as possible.
That would lead very nicely into the discussion about AMPs—the ticketing type of offences—and maybe that will help to allay some of the concerns that Mr. Conacher has in that regard. I'm not sure that they will work. I'm happy to have a more elaborate discussion about that enforcement mechanism.
Ultimately, the people I work with come with hat in hand. They say that they want to get their information into the registry as quickly as they possibly can and want help with compliance.