I'll say this in English, because I think it's good to have it in both official languages.
Just for the record, I will read in extenso an email dated April 7, 2026, at 4:37 p.m., as follows:
Considering that Alto is a Crown corporation accountable to Parliament through the minister of transport and as minister of finance you have no decision-making authority over matters of human resources at Alto, you do not have an opportunity to further the interest of any specific Alto employee.... There is no risk of conflict of interest and a screen is not required.
I just want to be very clear about the facts. When you're at the ethics committee, and you have a number of lawyers in the room, you have to stick with the facts and make sure that whatever you state in this committee is factually correct and is substantiated by evidence. That's why I brought the documents: to substantiate what I'm saying with evidence so that people can form their own opinion.
