I have colleagues who've participated in sponsored travel, parliamentarians representing all parties in the House, who have brought back different experiences as the result of sponsored travel. Some organizations, of course, are captured by the interpretation made by the commissioner. CIJA is one of those. Some government-funded organizations or governments are not captured by the interpretation made by the commissioner.
We agree that transparency is the most important piece, that the reporting that's available to the public is important.
What would you say to concerns about the risk of foreign interference? Some would say that perhaps in the case of CIJA, what's the straight line distance between the Government of Israel and the member of Parliament who's accepting the travel?