There are, of course, administrative monetary penalties, which influence high-level decisions. My goal would not be to impose penalties very often, because the mere fact that they exist becomes an incentive that promotes good decision-making.
The same applies to the power to issue orders, which also allows for faster results. At the moment, I can only issue recommendations. If those aren't followed, I have to go to court, which is costly and takes time. That's not ideal.
There is also the company's reputation, the importance of which should not be underestimated. That's why I make an effort to publicize the decisions we make, as well as our national and international expectations regarding corporate behaviour.
That said, I also believe in positive incentives. We need to recognize companies' good deeds. We must encourage them, in particular by ending an investigation more quickly when a company acts appropriately. That's what we did in the case of PowerSchool, where the company co-operated with us. We said that there was no need to conduct a lengthy investigation that would be costly for all involved, since we could obtain a letter of commitment and then follow up as required. We encourage such behaviour.