It is making the law enforcement work challenging. It brings innovation. It makes certain things easier. It makes certain things harder. I think in the Supreme Court's decision, the court recognized that. It said that it is creating challenges for law enforcement authorities. The court talked about innovation also helping law enforcement authorities in certain instances. You can get a warrant more easily and quickly because of technology. You can get an electronic warrant, and these types of things.
We need to look at the whole context. When I talk about necessity and proportionality, it certainly has to be context-based. Something that was not necessary before may be necessary now because of new technology and new challenges. I think the goal is to make sure that law enforcement authorities have the powers that they need but that they are appropriately challenged and limited. Looking at those criteria, these are the questions: Are we going too far in one direction, or are we going too far in the other direction? It's always a balance. That's the challenging work of legislators and courts.