I think this is entirely consistent with the questions that Mr. Majumdar was asking. It's not about coming down from the mountain to serve the great public; it's about there being a disincentive to doing so, whether it's up or down. It could be as simple as a member who's part of a union and would no longer have access to pension benefits because they came to the House of Commons and would be stepping away from the work they're doing.
We don't want to see people being forced to make decisions of divestiture even with the tax exemptions that the conflict of interest commissioner talked about, which I found very interesting. That's a good point and a good way of looking at it. However, ultimately, these people will sometimes have more than just a business interest; sometimes it's an emotional tie.
