Anyway, I just wanted to see whether that existed.
Mr. Christopherson seemed to be narrowing down the point here. You effectively want subsection 54(2) eliminated so that any collective agreement would be able to deal with matters governed by the staffing program. There must have been some rationale for that being there in the first place. You say that Deloitte and Touche gave you short shrift, that your employer doesn't seem to be overly enthusiastic about this issue, and that anytime you've gone to court they haven't been overly sympathetic to your situation. I don't know enough about collective bargaining or labour agreements to know why that would be there. What's the rationale for it being there in the first place?