Evidence of meeting #13 for Finance in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was audit.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Sheila Fraser  Auditor General of Canada
Jamie Hood  Principal, Office of the Auditor General of Canada

June 19th, 2006 / 4:55 p.m.

Bloc

Paul Crête Bloc Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Good afternoon. The committee is reviewing the first five years of the application of the Canada Revenue Agency Act, from 1999 to 2004.

I'd like to focus on a specific point: tax transactions in terms of offshore transactions. Have you done an assessment of that? You said that there was some research underway, that the agency wanted to estimate losses of federal tax revenue potentially resulting from tax evasion practices involving offshore transactions. Has the agency come up with an amount? Are you aware of that?

4:55 p.m.

Auditor General of Canada

Sheila Fraser

We don't have any specific amount, to my knowledge. In the 2002 report, I believe we mentioned that it amounted to hundreds of millions of dollars, but no specific figure was given. I don't know whether the agency has a more exact number for you.

4:55 p.m.

Bloc

Paul Crête Bloc Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Do you think that the act is effective enough in that regard, or should we make an amendment to enable the agency to identify and thwart tax evasion practices involving offshore financial transactions? Would there be any point in making such an amendment to the act?

4:55 p.m.

Auditor General of Canada

Sheila Fraser

As I said earlier, we are reluctant to suggest amendments to legislation. However, in 2002, we did indicate that the Department of Finance should analyze the impact of certain transactions, identified in our report, and see whether the act should be changed.

I believe we will be reporting on an audit of issues relating to treaties and so on, next year. We'll see whether there have been any changes or new developments.

4:55 p.m.

Bloc

Paul Crête Bloc Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

You said that in the 2002 report, it mentions that this probably amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars.

4:55 p.m.

Auditor General of Canada

Sheila Fraser

That was over 10 years or so.

4:55 p.m.

Bloc

Paul Crête Bloc Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

For 10 years in total, or from year to year?

4:55 p.m.

Auditor General of Canada

Sheila Fraser

No, in total.

4:55 p.m.

Bloc

Paul Crête Bloc Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

All right.

In answer to a question from my colleague, you said that there was an audit underway on this issue. You will be making a report, possibly next year. Could we have the data, in order of magnitude, on what you have identified? Is there a problem? Do you think the department should pay particular attention to this issue?

4:55 p.m.

Auditor General of Canada

Sheila Fraser

It's still far too early for that. We are in the beginning stages of the audit. The department may have some data for you, but we do not currently have any.

4:55 p.m.

Bloc

Paul Crête Bloc Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Is it a growing industry?

4:55 p.m.

Auditor General of Canada

Sheila Fraser

Unfortunately, we can't answer that question.

4:55 p.m.

Bloc

Paul Crête Bloc Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Okay, you have no information on that.

4:55 p.m.

Auditor General of Canada

Sheila Fraser

We will give you the answer next year.

4:55 p.m.

Bloc

Paul Crête Bloc Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Yes. It's an issue of concern to us. However, in your 2002 report, you mentioned $200 million. What does that represent for Canada in one year, in terms of tax evasion? Should that $200 million normally have been recovered?

4:55 p.m.

Auditor General of Canada

Sheila Fraser

We talked about hundreds of millions of dollars over a 10-year period, without giving any other details.

4:55 p.m.

Bloc

Paul Crête Bloc Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Hundreds of millions of dollars. All right.

4:55 p.m.

Auditor General of Canada

Sheila Fraser

We said that it was tax revenue that was beyond the grasp of Canadian authorities.

5 p.m.

Bloc

Paul Crête Bloc Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Apparently that tax evasion was allowed under the current act.

5 p.m.

Auditor General of Canada

5 p.m.

Bloc

Paul Crête Bloc Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

It's not necessarily illegal.

5 p.m.

Auditor General of Canada

Sheila Fraser

No. They were legal acts, consistent with the act. We recommended that the Department of Finance review the impact of certain provisions of the act that allowed this type of transaction and tax avoidance.

5 p.m.

Bloc

Paul Crête Bloc Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

All right.

According to my information, the Department of Finance has not done those analyses. Do you have any other information?

5 p.m.

Auditor General of Canada

Sheila Fraser

To my knowledge, the department has not yet done those analyses. That is something that we will look at in our audit.

5 p.m.

Bloc

Paul Crête Bloc Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

That should be released next spring?