I don't think I accused the Conservative government of being stingy Conservatives. I think what I said was that you have to balance a variety of competing needs, and just as paying off the debt is one of the needs to allow us a stable future, so is investing in post-secondary education. How you balance that--whether you cut the debt by $9 billion and put $4 billion into post-secondary education, or cut it by $13 billion, or do something else--is a choice you have to make. I think these factors have to be weighed in.
It's not a simple matter of whether you did something good or bad.