There are two things to say about that, Mr. McKay.
One is that you can never capture everybody. We all know that. One of the two things that will make it more likely that these individuals will be captured is the fact that now there is a legislative duty to collect certain information, which may have to be disclosed under the terms of the Supreme Court decision in Lavallee, which the law society, of course, fully accepts. Now you have people under a positive duty. Then you have, as you know as a lawyer, law societies able to examine books of individual members of the society, and when that happens, if there are breaches of the law, there are serious penalties for breaching the law. So it's important that you have a regime that, potentially, captures everybody. Some people may try to wiggle out of it, but the consequences are very clear for doing that. You're more likely to have compliance if you have a duty than if you just leave it wide open and say you can't catch everybody, so you won't do anything.