Mr. Chairperson, I am debating the amendment. I'm saying that with everything else off the table, we are left with some vague notion about income trusts. Therefore, Mr. Dykstra's amendment makes some sense. If everything else is off the table, we are left with debating the history, the sad saga, of this whole income trust file, beginning with the Liberals' mess in 2005, their flip-flopping and whiffle-waffling all over the place. We are left to discuss, again, the tax leakage issue, although the Liberals themselves have the file on that, the documents they sponsored to show the tax leakage. They supported the reports put out by Jack Mintz, C.D. Howe, and a number of other organizations who clearly identified the huge loss of tax revenue as a result of income trusts.
Mr. Chairman, on that basis, I guess we might as well consider this amendment--