With regard to the amendment proposed by Mr. Dykstra, it's my understanding that after the principal motion, which is basically to have hearings and witnesses on the income trust issue, the committee, with regard to future business discussions, will seek proposed witnesses from the members to deal with matters that they believe are germane to the discussion.
I would think the amendment proposed by Mr. Dykstra is acceptable in terms of any witnesses, but it's limiting those additional witnesses or pre-empting someone from having additional witnesses, which we'll discuss later, because it focuses solely on what the previous government did.
I would suggest that the amendment is limiting what we are going to do in the second hour of this meeting. I would suggest that it either be ruled out of order or else we will just vote against it.