Thank you, sir.
I want to come at this from a slightly different angle. Whenever you put larger potential penalties in place, you run the risk of not being able to come to settlements on things. I think this could lead to litigation and unintended action on both sides, and I just don't see that it's necessary. A 100% increase in this amount to $200,000 is significant, and I'd just ask that members of the committee think about what they're pondering.
I concur with Mr. McKay that it's a bit of bashing and not much more than that.