The purpose was to intensify our efforts to go after aggressive tax planning. Now, as I recall, before opening those centres of expertise we were still pursuing these matters, but these centres allowed us to do it with greater resources and more effectively, isn't that right? Basically, CRA had been going after this kind of behaviour for many years, it's fair to say, but the centres of expertise allowed us to do it more expeditiously.
I remember visiting one of these places, having quite a long conversation with the people working there, and being very impressed with their commitment and knowledge. But I also remember that they were quite frustrated by certain court decisions that seemed to stymie their efforts to deal with these abusive double-dip structures and other things of that nature.
Have those efforts encountered further blockages by the courts--I haven't followed this as much since I left--or are there pending decisions that haven't yet been made?