I would certainly like to support this. With respect to the comments we just heard from both Mr. McKay and Mr. McCallum, I would have to question what it is we're going to provide to the investors that Mr. Purdy Crawford and those who are travelling with him can't provide to those investors at those meetings. As we've all heard, it's a very complicated issue, and I wouldn't like to be in the position of doing anything more than hearing them. For us to even hear these concerns before that point would be inappropriate. We're going to lead these individuals on by hearing from them before April 25, before they make the decision.
I would encourage a process that is a private-sector-led process. Government has not been part of this, nor should it be part of this. This is a private-sector-led process. Let's let it work its way out. They've been working on this since August. For us to interfere prematurely now I think would be a disservice to those investors. So I would certainly support Mr. Del Mastro's amendment.