What I was trying to talk about was more the structure of the programs themselves. Many disability programs are “all or nothing” propositions. In other words, you get that program, you get the benefits from it—CPP disability is much like that—but if you go back to full-time work then you receive absolutely nothing from the program. What we're saying is there's an opportunity for people with episodic disabilities to be able to have a sharing arrangement whereby the program would provide some of its income, maybe a half of it, and someone can get the other half from employment. But when you have disability programs based on that “all or nothing” proposition then they don't work for people who otherwise could be in the labour force.
The second point is the working income tax benefit that was brought in a couple of years ago, in 2007. In the budget of 2008, there was a specific proposal for a working income tax benefit for persons with disabilities, but when we saw the program rolled out in 2009, there was no mention of what some of us call the “WITB-D”, and that was an opportunity that perhaps was missed.