My third question is for the solar association. A former colleague of mine, Bob Mills--you may have known him--was a former chair of the environment committee. He turned his entire home into a solar home. He threatened to sue the Alberta government to allow him to put power on the grid in Alberta, and I certainly commend him for that.
I asked him what his challenges were in terms of adopting a completely solar home, both in terms of power and in terms of water. He said they were the upfront capital costs, the grid accepting the power and compensating him for it, which was addressed, thanks to his efforts, and frankly, builders who actually knew how to install it in a cost-effective way.
He and other solar organizations would say that it's not necessarily a national program. It's actually whether the province chooses, at least in the short term, to make it more cost-effective or to reduce the cost between solar and other forms of, say, electrical production, such as coal in Alberta. He would argue that it was almost more of a provincial response that was needed in terms of, say, the short-term subsidization of producing solar power.
So why are you recommending a national program rather than having the province adopt, say, what they have in Ontario?