While certainly we were part of the over 13,000 organizations that opposed the decision to get rid of the mandatory long-form census, in addition to this, we saw what seemed to be a casting aside of the willingness to collect data, which is interesting for the university sector. I mean it's somewhat ironic that for our research institutions we would get out of the business of doing research on them. Nevertheless, I think it's part of an interesting development that the importance of maintaining data collection is not seen as being important going forward.
So the idea of continuing to collect data that's been paid for over the course of several decades and continuing to measure that against future data...we've essentially thrown money out the window by not continuing to collect that same data going forward and not understanding the effects of the billions of dollars that are spent on the post-secondary education sector. That effect on the economy is problematic. That's why we've stood shoulder to shoulder with the other organizations that oppose the long-form census...and continue to see concern with the effective gathering of statistics in the post-secondary education sector as well.