You're still looking for somebody who's an employee of the charity, though. Factually they're an employee of the charity, but they're being paid by a corporation. Maybe they're trying to do that to try to avoid the rule. I don't know that they do, necessarily, because if legally they still have an employment relationship with the charity, then they should be caught by the rule as it is, without this.
On December 8th, 2010. See this statement in context.