Thank you for that.
You have to understand that in that question we were asking members to distinguish among the different options there. You're quite right to point out that if we simply went on the basis of this, we would only be recommending a supplementary CPP. However, the point we're making here is simply that if you look at the whole thing, only 3% say do nothing at all. That's the most important message.
As to the different ways of getting to the kind of coverage we want to see, there are many ways of going about it. We are just saying, in terms of covering everybody, that the most obvious way of doing that is to make it mandatory.
A simple way might be to use the CPP, although we are not only recommending doubling the CPP. There are all of these other options on the table, but the essential point is that there must be coverage of the entire gap left after the current public systems are accounted for.