I might add that I happen to be a police officer on a leave of absence, so the enforcement part of this I think is important. We had some witnesses here from the RCMP and from CRA talking about how important it is that they have not only the research but the tools and the legislative measures to proceed with the enforcement. So I appreciate that you made that comment.
Some people believe that the more rules we put in, and the bigger the book gets on rules, that's not necessarily welcome. In the case of tax evasion and tax avoidance, though, do you agree that sometimes you just have to have a large number of rules to stay one step ahead of the people who are trying to take maximum advantage of the way the code is written?